Baker, Donelson et al
Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz P.C. (formerly Baker Donelson) is a large U.S. law firm and lobbying group with offices in the Southeastern United States, Washington, D.C. and London, England. According to the National Law Journal's 2010 rankings, it is the 72nd largest law firm in the United States, and the largest in the state of Tennessee. Forbes has twice selected Baker Donelson as one of the 100 Best Companies to Work For, citing the firm's commitment to diversity, public service and pro bono work.
Source: Wikipedia
Campaign Finance
Figures are based on itemized contributions reported to the Federal Election Commission and state agencies. Please note that:
- contributions under $200 are not reported, and so are not included in totals.
- only contributions from individuals and organizations to candidates are included. Various accounting measures and more exotic contribution types are excluded.
- contributions are matched based on organization and recipient name reported within each election cycle. Contributions using an incorrect or non-standard version of the name may be missed.
- corporate name changes and mergers may cause figures to differ from those of the Center for Responsive Politics.
- organization totals include known subsidiaries of the organization.
For more information, please see our campaign finance methodology page. Lobbyist bundling data is described on our lobbyist bundling methodology page.
Latest FEC Data
covers through committee's May 31, 2012 filing.-
Summary
overview of the committee's finances- Total Raised:
- $234,285
- Total Spent:
- $92,320
- Cash on Hand:
- $377,511
- Debts:
- $0
Standardized Donation Information
covers through 2011. may lag behind FEC section above, as donors and industries are identified by hand.-
Top Recipients
- Employee Color Block
- Individuals
- PAC Color Block
- PAC
-
Republicans vs. Democrats
in dollars -
State vs. Federal
in dollars -
Top PAC Recipients
- Employee Color Block
- Individuals
- PAC Color Block
- PAC
Lobbying
$3,340,000 IncomeFigures are based on lobbying activity reported to the Senate Office of Public Records. Reported dollar amounts are required to be accurate only to the nearest $20,000. For organizations whose primary business is lobbying, we display total income and top clients. For organizations that are not primarily lobbying firms, we display total amount spent on lobbying and top lobbying firms hired.
For more information, please see our lobbying methodology page.
Lobbying Carried Out by Baker, Donelson et al
-
Names of Lobbyists
-
Client Amount Toshiba Corp $900,000 L-3 Communications $200,000 WR Grace & Co $180,000 Scooter Store $180,000 University of Kentucky $150,000 Nuclear Energy Institute $120,000 BAE Systems $120,000 St Luke's Episcopal Health System $120,000 Metro Gold Line Foothill Ext Constr Auth $90,000 DuPage County, Illinois $90,000 -
Most Frequently Disclosed Lobbying Issues
- Medicare & Medicaid,
- Fed Budget & Appropriations,
- Transportation,
- Health Issues,
- Homeland Security,
- Energy & Nuclear Power,
- Defense,
- Copyright, Patent & Trademark,
- Education,
- Environment & Superfund
-
Recent Lobbying Contracts
Date Client Summary July 13, 2012 National Ground Water Assn Federal public policy issues pertaining to stewardship, responsible uses and protection of groundwater resources. View registration April 20, 2012 NEUROSTIMULATION DEVICE ALLIANCE Medicare Coverage & reimbursement View registration April 20, 2012 The Diabetic Shoppe Medicare DME reimbursement View registration
Regulations
1 Mentions; 1 SubmissionsAll data is based on documents downloaded from Regulations.gov. The first table shows mentions: all documents that include the name of the company anywhere in the document or document metadata. The second table shows submissions: all documents where the submitter metadata included the company name. Each table shows the top 10 dockets, ranked by number of occurrences.
Matches are based on a search for the company name. Variations in the company name, such as acronyms, nicknames or alternate names may cause documents to be missed. The mention of a company name in a document may be incidental and does not necessarily indicate that the company has any relevance to the document. Company names that are common English words may erroneously match with text that is not referring to the company.
Not all agencies submit public comments to Regulations.gov. For a list of participating and non-participating agencies see here. Agencies that do submit to Regulations.gov have varying levels of accuracy and completeness.
Regulations and public comments can be downloaded in bulk here.
The tables show occurrences of "Baker, Donelson et al" in public comments on proposed federal regulations.
-
Documents Submitted by the Organization
-
Mentions in Document Text
Advisory Committees
1 person on 1 committeeData is based on disclosures required by the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA). Matches are based on the occurrence of the company name in the committee member affiliation. Variations in company names may cause some matches to be missed.
The table shows only the top 10 agencies. To search and download raw records from the complete dataset see the FACA data section.
Table shows employees of "Baker, Donelson et al" that sat on federal advisory committees.
View all advisory committee data for Baker, Donelson et al